Resources Details
Mark Anthony Gooden on Culturally Responsive School Leadership (Article)
The authors discuss the need for Cultuarlly Responsive School Leadership (CRSL) both in districts and within the educational leadership programs. The describe CRSL as an equity focused lens that interrogates and disrupts cultural and racial bias.
Citation/Source
Rebora, A. (2023). Mark Anthony Gooden on Culturally Responsive School Leadership. Educational Leadership, 80(8), 14–19
Publication Date 2024
Lost Opportunities: How Disparate School Discipline Continues to Drive Differences in the Opportunity to Learn (WEBPAGE)
This national study provides a comprehensive analysis of the instructional days lost due to out-of-school suspensions in 2015-16 for middle and high school students The study demonstrates how the frequent use of suspensions contributes to stark inequities in the opportunity to learn. This study will help you understand the impact on every social group and students with disabilities.
Citation/Source
Losen, D.J., Martinez, P. 2020. Lost Opportunities: How Disparate School Discipline Continues to Drive Differences in the Opportunity to Learn. Los Angeles, California: The Civil Rights Project. https://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/school-discipline/lost-opportunities-how-disparate-school-discipline-continues-to-drive-differences-in-the-opportunity-to-learn#:~:text=Info-,LostOpportunitiesHowDisparateSchoo
Publication Date 2024
Lost Instruction Time in California Schools: The Disparate Harm from Post-pandemic Punitive Suspensions
This report highlights how post-COVID suspensions in 2021–2022 have added to the pandemic’s harmful impact of instructional loss, especially for students from “high-needs” groups, who were most harmed by the pandemic. In addition, the analysis of district level data demonstrated that many districts have bucked the overarching statewide trend showing a slight reduction in rates of lost instruction due to OSS in comparison to the pre-COVID years. The report also describes evidence of extreme differences in how some districts responded to student misconduct in 2021–2022. This report uses the data on student enrollment and the raw count of days lost due to OSS to establish a baseline measure for calculating comparable rates of lost instruction for every group in every district in California.
Citation/Source
Flores, R.T. and Daniel J. Losen (2023). Lost Instruction Time in California Schools: The Disparate Harm from Post-Pandemic Punitive Suspensions. Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles, University of California Los Angeles. Accessed March 25, 2024.
Publication Date 2024
Lost at School: Why Our Kids with Behavioral Challenges are Falling Through the Cracks and How We can Help Them (BOOK)
With revisions to the Collaborative and Proactive Solutions model, Dr. Greene looks to the etiology of classroom behavior challenges and provides teachers with tools to assist as they help children succeed at school.
Citation/Source
Greene, Ross. 2014. Lost at School: Why Our Kids with Behavioral Challenges are Falling Through the Cracks and How We can Help Them. New York: Scribner.
Publication Date 2024
Local Equity Action Development (LEAD) (PDF)
Describes a local change process, LEAD, which is grounded in cultural competence that addresses disproportionality in special education and other equity issues facing Indiana schools.
Citation/Source
Shana Ritter and Russell J. Skiba (2006) Center for Evaluation and Education Policy.
Publication Date 2024
Local Education Agency Reports (WEBSITE)
Short summaries of outcome data for special education programs and students in California school districts.
Citation/Source
Short summaries of outcome data for special education programs and students in California school districts.
Publication Date 2024
Listening to “Frequent Flyers”: What Persistently Disciplined Students Have to Say About Being Labeled as “Bad” (ARTICLE)
This article details results of a qualitative research study completed with black and mixed-race students from a large urban middle school in the Southeast United States. It is unique in that it is one of few studies that allows first person student voice and perspective in the discussion of disproportionate disciplinary procedures. Educators may wish to use this article to reflect on students’ perceptions of exclusionary discipline to compare and contrast them with their own.
Citation/Source
Kennedy-Lewis, Brianna L, and Murphy, Amy S. 2016. “Listening to “Frequent Flyers”: What Persistently Disciplined Students Have to Say About Being Labeled as “Bad.” Teachers College Record 1(18).
Publication Date 2024
Linguistically Appropriate Goals (PowerPoint)
This resource is intended as a goal writing tool to assist both regular and special educators to meet the needs of students who are identified as English learners (EL) and may possibly need to be identified or are currently identified for special education.
Citation/Source
Ventura County Special Education Local Plan Area, (2019).
Publication Date 2024
Letter from the United States Secretary of Education, dated July 19, 2022 (Webpage)
This letter from Secretary Cardona highlights key resources and information about resources from the Department that may be useful in supporting the needs of students with disabilities in particular, including tools for schools to assist students in addressing any disability-based behaviors that could otherwise interfere with their or other students' learning, or that could lead to student discipline or impact safety
Citation/Source
Miguel A. Cardona. 2022. Letter from the United States Secretary of Education, dated July 19, 2022. https://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/secletter/220719.html (accessed September 16, 2022).
Publication Date 2024
Lessons from the Pilot of MTSS School-Site Implementation
This brief distills key lessons from the pilot phase of the Scaling Up MTSS Statewide Initiative and found that educators’ experiences with other tiered intervention programs fundamentally shaped how MTSS implementation unfolded at school sites. This was due in large part to the MTSS framework being too broad in scope to provide schools with clarity and guidance; too narrow in how student behaviors are assessed and addressed to facilitate innovation; and silent on issues of race and culture.
Citation/Source
Chong, S., Ortiz-Gonzalez, I., Koon, D., Winn, L. (2023). Lessons from the Pilot of MTSS School-Site Implementation. California MTSS Research Consortium, UCLA Center for the Transformation of Schools. Accessed September 5, 2023. https://transformschools.ucla.edu/research/ca-multi-tiered-system-of-support-ca-mtss-pilot-program/
Publication Date 2024
Funding Information
California Department of Education, Special Education Division’s special project, State Performance Plan Technical Assistance Project (SPP-TAP) is funded through a contract with the Napa County Office of Education. SPP-TAP is funded from federal funds, (State Grants #H027A080116) provided from the U.S. Department of Education Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position of the U.S. Department of Education.
