Resources Details
OSEP Fast Facts: Students with Disabilities Who Are English Learners (ELs) Served Under IDEA Part B (Webpage)
This fact sheet provides national data about demographics of English Learners (EL), including trend data and data disaggregated by disability, placement of EL students with disabilities, and high school completion.
Citation/Source
Office of Special Education Programs. 2022. OSEP Fast Facts: Students With Disabilities Who Are English Learners (ELs) Served Under IDEA Part B https://sites.ed.gov/idea/osep-fast-facts-students-with-disabilities-english-learners (accessed September 16, 2022).
Publication Date 2024
OSEP Fast Facts: Educational Environments of Children with Disabilities, Ages 5 (in kindergarten) through 21, Served under IDEA Part B (Webpage)
This document highlights national data regarding the number of students with disabilities that are receiving a free and appropriate public education (FAPE). The data are disaggregated by gender, location of education, English language proficiency, type of disability, disciplinary removals, and by state.
Citation/Source
Office of Special Education Programs. 2022. OSEP Fast Facts: Educational Environments of Children with Disabilities, Ages 5 (in kindergarten) through 21, Served under IDEA Part B https://sites.ed.gov/idea/osep-fast-facts-school-aged-children-5-21-served-under-idea-part-b-21/ (accessed September 16, 2022).
Publication Date 2024
OSEP Fast Facts: Educational Environments for School-Aged Children with Disabilities (Webpage)
This document highlights national data regarding the percentage of time students with disabilities are educated with their typically developing peers. The data are disaggregated by placement, disability, race/ethnicity, and by state.
Citation/Source
Office of Special Education Programs. 2022. OSEP Fast Facts: Educational Environments for School-Aged Children with Disabilities. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/osep-fast-facts-educational-environments-school-aged-children-disabilities/ (accessed September 16, 2022).
Publication Date 2024
OPTEL User Guide
This user guide supports educators using the OPTEL tool to observe and evaluate English Learner students’ English language proficiency. Keywords: English Learners, reclassification, California, language proficiency,
Citation/Source
California Department of Education (2023). OPTEL User Guide. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education. Accessed March 25, 2024.
Publication Date 2024
Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Topic Brief and Links to Discussion Guides, Disproportionality and Overidentification (WEBSITE)
Click on each of the regulation titles to find questions for leading dialogue.
Citation/Source
Click on each of the regulation titles to find questions for leading dialogue.
Publication Date 2024
Observation Protocol for Teachers of English Learners (OPTEL)
This document fulfills requirements in Education Code 313(f)(2) for the teacher evaluation component N of the statewide reclassification criteria. This form may also be used as a tool for formative purposes and ongoing consultation with parents/guardians. OPTEL will soon be translated into the top six languages in California.
The tool has three main sections: receptive language, expressive language, and parent consultation to examine English language proficiency for English Learners. For the language portions there are observations for instructional setting and interaction type as well as ratings of evidence and accommodations provided. Parent input is embedded within the tool.
Citation/Source
California Department of Education (2023). Observation Protocol for Teachers of English Learners (OPTEL). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education. Accessed March 25, 2024.
Publication Date 2024
NOTE: Overrepresentation in Special Education: Does the IDEA Violate the Equal Protection Clause? (PDF)
This law commentary article examines if and how overrepresentation in special education might violate the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Citation/Source
Miles, Alana. 2016. “NOTE: Overrepresentation in Special Education: Does the IDEA Violate the Equal Protection Clause?” Rutgers Race & the Law Review 17 (245).
Publication Date 2024
No Shame or Stigmas: Prioritizing Students Experiencing Homelessness in Long Beach Unified and Monterey County (Website)
Homelessness is a condition that is intersectional with the educational experiences and outcomes of youth. This brief highlights state and school officials’ perspectives to examine relevant challenges, policies, and practices related to the youth homelessness crisis. In addition to identifying pertinent challenges, participants provided insights into established and emerging practices and approaches that have been effective in meeting the needs of homeless youth.
Citation/Source
Dumas, T., James, A., and Bishop, J. (2023). No Shame or Stigmas: Prioritizing Students Experiencing Homelessness in Long Beach Unified and Monterey County. California MTSS Research Consortium, UCLA Center for the Transformation of Schools. Accessed September 5, 2023.
Publication Date 2024
New York State Education Department My Brother’s Keeper Guidance Document: Emerging Practices for Schools and Communities (PDF)
This report commissioned by the New York State Education Department explores strategies to help boys and young men of color—and all students—realize their full potential. The report provides an overview of the outcome trends among boys of color in K-12 school environments, and a research review of the most prevalent strategies currently being implemented in schools and communities across the country.
New Resource Title
Article text for the resource goes here.
Funding Information
California Department of Education, Special Education Division’s special project, State Performance Plan Technical Assistance Project (SPP-TAP) is funded through a contract with the Napa County Office of Education. SPP-TAP is funded from federal funds, (State Grants #H027A080116) provided from the U.S. Department of Education Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position of the U.S. Department of Education.
